Vulnerable Customers A Critical Gap in Compliance Processes
In the evolving landscape of UK automotive finance, ensuring fair treatment of vulnerable customers remains a key focus for regulators. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has emphasised the importance of identifying and supporting individuals who may be at a disadvantage when securing finance or insurance products. However, our recent research has uncovered a concerning trend: fewer than 1% of customers are being identified as vulnerable. This figure raises serious questions about the industry's ability to meet FCA expectations and mitigate future risks.
The Challenge of Identifying Vulnerability
Vulnerability in consumer finance can take many forms, including financial hardship, health issues, limited financial literacy, or major life events. The FCA defines a vulnerable customer as someone who, due to personal circumstances, is at a higher risk of experiencing harm. Dealerships, lenders, and finance brokers are expected to proactively identify and support such customers.
However, our findings indicate a significant under-identification of vulnerability. Despite FCA guidelines and expectations, the industry is struggling to implement effective processes for recognising and recording vulnerable customers. This could stem from a combination of the following:
Lack of Training and Awareness: Sales and finance teams may not be equipped to spot the often subtle indicators of vulnerability.
Inconsistent Processes: There is no standardised approach across dealerships and finance providers, leading to gaps in identification.
Customer Reluctance to Disclose Information: Many customers may be unwilling to share personal difficulties, making it harder for businesses to assess their needs.
Pressure to Sell: In some cases, commercial pressures might discourage teams from fully investigating a customer’s potential vulnerability.
Regulatory Risks: What This Means for the Industry
The FCA’s Consumer Duty framework, which came into force in 2023, places an increased burden on firms to act in good faith, avoid foreseeable harm, and support customer needs. With such a low percentage of customers identified as vulnerable, there is a genuine risk that many businesses are not meeting these expectations.
Failure to comply with FCA guidelines could lead to:
Regulatory Action: The FCA has shown a willingness to fine firms that fail to protect vulnerable customers, as seen in other financial sectors.
Reputational Damage: Dealerships and finance providers risk losing consumer trust if they fail to act responsibly.
Operational Disruption: If the FCA intervenes, businesses may be forced to overhaul their customer service and compliance processes at great expense.
The Growing Threat from Claims Management Companies (CMCs)
Beyond FCA scrutiny, the industry must also be mindful of the growing influence of Claims Management Companies (CMCs). These firms actively seek out customers who may have been mis-sold financial products, including car finance agreements. A failure to properly identify vulnerable customers could open the door for future claims, particularly if customers argue they were not provided with the appropriate level of care or understanding during the sales process.
CMCs have already played a significant role in driving claims within the financial services sector, most notably in the Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) scandal and, lately, Discretionary Commission Arrangements (DCA). There is a real possibility that a similar wave of claims could arise in automotive finance if vulnerable customers are found to have been disadvantaged.
What Needs to Change?
To mitigate these risks, the industry must take a more proactive approach to identifying and supporting vulnerable customers. Key steps include:
Enhanced Staff Training: Ensuring all customer-facing teams understand vulnerability indicators and are confident in handling sensitive situations.
Improved Data Collection: Implementing robust systems to document customer interactions and vulnerability assessments.
Stronger Customer Communication: Encouraging customers to disclose potential vulnerabilities without fear of discrimination.
Regular Compliance Audits: Review internal processes to ensure FCA standards are consistently met.
Utilising Technology to Identify and Support Vulnerable Customers: Leveraging compliance software solutions can help businesses systematically record and monitor vulnerable customers. Digital tools can assist in:
Identifying potential vulnerabilities through structured customer assessments.
Documenting support provided, ensuring a clear audit trail for compliance purposes.
Generating Management Information (MI) data, enabling businesses to measure the effectiveness of their vulnerability policies and make informed decisions.
Conclusion
Our research highlights a critical gap in how the UK automotive industry identifies and supports vulnerable customers. With regulatory scrutiny increasing and potential claims risks rising, firms must act now to close this gap. By prioritising compliance, training, and customer care, the industry can ensure fair outcomes for all consumers while protecting itself from financial and reputational damage.
In a market where trust and transparency are paramount, failing to address this issue could have long-term consequences. The time for action is now.
Get in Touch with ComplianceTrak
Ensuring compliance with FCA regulations and protecting vulnerable customers doesn’t have to be a challenge. ComplianceTrak offers industry-leading Compliance Software and expert Compliance Services designed to help dealer groups and finance providers identify, manage, and support vulnerable customers effectively.
If you need guidance on FCA compliance, vulnerability identification, or process improvement, our team of automotive industry experts is here to help. Contact ComplianceTrak today to find out how we can support your business in staying compliant and ahead of regulatory changes.
📩 Get in touch with us to learn more about how ComplianceTrak can streamline your compliance processes and protect your business from regulatory and reputational risks.
Commentaires